Originally Posted by
Craig Simpson
I agree with what Chad is saying. I think perhaps its too late for this season, but I don't think the 20% reduction from the NHL is enough to really make the cap as challenging as it should. I believe the NHL's cap hit is for a 23 man roster, which means our 14 man roster is 61% of theirs. Even if its based on a 20 man roster (which I don't believe it is, but someone can correct me if I'm wrong), that's still 70% of the NHL cap with our 14-man roster. A rollback of 20% benefits those who spend a lot and penalizes those who don't spend a lot (by having an artificially comparable high ceiling and floor). I think the number should be at least 30% of the NHL's to really have the equivalent difficulty. I understand that the bottom six positions we are missing are probably the lowest paid positions in the NHL, but I'm looking at cap numbers and I see its not that challenging to have a lot of big money players on your roster.